Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Paul Johnson v. J. Beard, et al
as 21-16846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director/Secretary of CDCR, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, Warden of HDSP, J. PRICE, Warden, DVI and others
Paul Johnson v. J. Beard, et al
as 21-16368
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director/Secretary of CDCR, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, Warden of HDSP, J. PRICE, Warden, DVI and others
Paul Johnson v. D. Runnels, et al
as 21-15888
Defendant / Appellee:
Y. P. CHEN, MD at CSP-SOL, BINOYE NAKU, L. B. BROWN, Jr., MD at CDCR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Paul Johnson v. Mahmoud, et al
as 20-16498
Defendant:
J. PRICE, N. ACQUVA, F. KREITLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
G. SWARTHOUT, Y. P. CHEN, MAHMOUD, MD at CSP-SOL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Paul Johnson v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 19-16485
Defendant / Appellee:
Y. P. CHEN, MD at CSP-SOL, W. ZHENG, MD for DVI, MAHMOUD, MD at CSP-SOL and others
Defendant:
A. TRAQUINA, MD at CSP-SOL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
James v. Price et al
as 2:2017cv01433
Defendant:
J Price , T Green , A. Cereghino and others
Plaintiff:
Dannie James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Price et al
as 5:2017cv01767
Defendant:
J. Price , T. Green , A. Cereghino and others
Plaintiff:
Dannie James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Tesluk et al
as 2:2016cv02268
Plaintiff:
Kevin Eddis Moore
Defendant:
G. Tesluk, P. Nguyen, H. Win and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Beard
as 2:2015cv01313
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
J. A. Beard, D. L. Runnels, G. Swarthout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Win, et al
as 2:2014cv01714
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Ramirez
Defendant:
H. Win, C. Ortiz, K. Wing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
