Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Ham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01017
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Ham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Walker v. Rochester Police Department et al
as 6:2020cv06552
Defendant:
Police Officer Erin Rodgers, New York Division of Parole, City of Rochester and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick E. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Saldivar v. 3506 94 St Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06690
Defendant:
Hyun Ju Ham, Elmhurst CTR, Inc., Hyun Ham and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Saldivar
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ham v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv05357
Defendant:
NYPD Police Officers John Doe 1 - 5, NYPD Det. Coffey, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Ham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Raul v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv05355
Plaintiff:
Ham Raul and Raul Ham
Defendant:
P.O. John Doe 1 - 5, P.O. Adrian Klusek, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ham v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv05356
Defendant:
NYPD Police Officers John Doe 1 - 5, NYPD Adrian Klusek, NYPD Det. Coffey and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Ham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dominguez v. Mordland Associates Fort Ham, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv04983
Defendant:
Mordechai Cohen and Mordland Associates Fort Ham, LLC
Plaintiff:
Miguel Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ham v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03256
Defendant:
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc., Zimmer US, Inc. and Zimmer, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Felicia Ham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Ham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
