Cases 1 - 10 of 10
TAYLOR-EL v. ZICKEFOOSE et al
as 1:2010cv03272
Petitioner:
KENNETH JEROME TAYLOR-EL
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00307
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BAUMGARTEN v. ZICKEFOOSE et al
as 1:2009cv06169
Petitioner:
JOHN VINCENT BAUMGARTEN, SR.
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TOOLASPRASHAD v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv05335
Plaintiff:
LATCHMIE TOOLASPRASHAD
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, KATHLEEN M. KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SESS v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv04762
Petitioner:
ALAN LLOYD SESS
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VAZQUEZ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv01440
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN VAZQUEZ
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. GRONDOLSKY and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JONES v. ZICKEFOOSE et al
as 1:2008cv06425
Petitioner:
LATORIA JONES
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ARMSTRONG v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv06131
Plaintiff:
MARTIN ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and D. SCOTT DODRILL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
NELSON v. GRONDOLSKY et al
as 1:2008cv05653
Plaintiff:
SEAN NELSON
Defendant:
J. GRONDOLSKY and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JULIANO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2008cv03700
Petitioner:
MARK JULIANO
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN J. GRONDOLSKY and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
