Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Nelson v. Filson et al
as 3:2021cv00202
Defendant:
Quentin Byrne, Timothy Filson, Harold Byrne and others
Plaintiff:
Charles P. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Burns v. Tasheena Sandoval, et al
as 21-15409
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BURNS
Defendant / Appellee:
WALTER ROMERO, CLARK, HAMMEL and others
Brendan Nasby v. State of Nevada, et al
as 21-15044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENDAN NASBY
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD BYRNE, SAC #49, STATE OF NEVADA, TARA CARPENTER and others
Dario Rodriguez v. E.K. McDaniels, et al
as 20-17045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARIO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, MERCADO, CRITICAL RESISTANCE, from member case 3:16-cv-609 and others
Mallory v. Burton et al
as 5:2020cv00065
Plaintiff:
James Mallory and Saddiq Al-Rahman Muhammad
Defendant:
Sgt. Burton, Mike Harold Byrne and Steve Haney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallory v. Burton et al
as 3:2020cv00122
Plaintiff:
James Mallory and Saddiq Al-Rahman Muhammad
Defendant:
Sgt. Burton, Mike Harold Byrne and Steve Haney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Mixon v. NDOC, et al
as 19-17354
Defendant / Appellee:
DIAMOND, C/O, MIKE BYRNE, AWO, AKA Harold Byrne, SUNDAY, C/O and others
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ELY STATE PRISON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO LEE MIXON
Vincent Pinder v. Harold Byrnes, et al
as 19-16657
Defendant:
OXBORROW, WAYNE OAKLEY, CURTIS KERNER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT H. PINDER
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDALL D. SCHULTHIES and HAROLD BYRNES
Hill v. Byrne et al
as 3:2019cv00454
Defendant:
T. Sandoval, H. Wickham, W. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Rickie L. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Sandoval et al
as 3:2019cv00451
Defendant:
Tasheena Sandoval, Harold Byrnes, Renee Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Rickie L. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
