Cases 1 - 9 of 9
David W. Gross v. Armond Hawkins et al
as 2:2023cv07466
Plaintiff:
David W. Gross
Defendant:
Armond Hawkins and Does 1 to 10
Hawkins et al. v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al.
as 2:2016cv00827
Plaintiff:
Charles Hawkins and Odesser H Hawkins
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beverly J. Hawkins v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv08052
Defendant:
Aztec Foreclosure Corporation, Does and PHH Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff:
Beverly J. Hawkins
Hawkins v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2013at00196
Plaintiff:
Gary Hawkins
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hawkins v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00499
Plaintiff:
Gary Hawkins
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Hawkins et al
as 1:2012cv02689
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant:
David L. Hawkins and Helen Beresford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kim Barfield-Hawkins v. CitiMortgage Inc et al
as 2:2012cv03855
Defendant:
Bank of America N A, CitiMortgage Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Barfield-Hawkins
US Bank National Association v. Juaquin Hawkins et al
as 5:2012cv00105
Defendant:
Does and Juaquin Hawkins
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
GRH Kaysville, LLC et al v. Oroville Plaza Company et al
as 2:2007cv00440
Plaintiff:
GRH Kaysville, LLC, GRH Kaysville, LLC, Jason Hawkins Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant:
Oroville Plaza Company, Oroville Plaza Company, Oroville Plaza Shopping Center, L.P. and others
Counter Claimant:
Oroville Plaza Shopping Center, L.P.
Counter Defendant:
GRH Kaysville, LLC and Jason Hawkins Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
