Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rosenfeld Family Foundation v. HD Supply Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04854
Defendant:
Kathleen J. Affeldt, Charles W. Peffer, Patrick R. McNamee and others
Plaintiff:
Rosenfeld Family Foundation
HD Supply Construction Supply, Ltd. v. Mowers et al
as 1:2019cv02750
Defendant:
Washoutpan.com, LLC and Reef R. Mowers
Plaintiff:
HD Supply Construction Supply, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Calderaro v. Deangelo et al
as 1:2017cv02983
Plaintiff:
James Calderaro
Defendant:
Joseph J. Deangelo, Evan J. Levitt, Kathleen J. Affeldt and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Zhou v. Deangelo et al
as 1:2017cv02977
Plaintiff:
Sean Zhou
Defendant:
Joseph J. Deangelo, Evan J. Levitt, Kathleen J. Affeldt and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Ebisike v. HD Supply Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02984
Defendant:
Evan J. Levitt, HD Supply Holdings, Inc. and Joseph J. Deangelo
Plaintiff:
Obioma Ebisike
Petitioner:
Local 272 Labor-Management Pension Fund and Fire and Police Pension Fund, San Antonio
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
City of Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System v. HD Supply Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02587
Plaintiff:
City of Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System
Defendant:
HD Supply Holdings, Inc. , Joseph J. Deangelo and Evan J. Levitt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
