Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Oravetz v. NDOC Medical Director et al
as 2:2023cv00597
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Oravetz
Defendant:
NDOC Medical Director, HDSP Warden, HDSP Physician and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonham v. HDSP Warden et al
as 2:2022cv01230
Petitioner:
Bryan P. Bonham
Respondent:
HDSP Warden and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melvin Joseph Simmons v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 2:2021cv06671
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons, Jr.
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Kathleen Allison and HDSP Warden B. Kibler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lino Isaias Davalos Perez v. HDSP Warden B. Kibler
as 2:2020cv11090
Respondent:
HDSP Warden B. Kibler
Petitioner:
Lino Isaias Davalos Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Victor Tagle v. Michael Anderson, et al
as 19-16531
Defendant / Appellee:
ARTINGER, ESP Senior Guard, KARNEZ, NDOC Informant/Inmate, RESEE WALDREN, NDOC Informant/Inmate and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR MANUEL TAGLE
Ratanak Kim v. F. Foulk
as 17-55160
Petitioner - Appellant:
RATANAK KIM
Respondent - Appellee:
F. FOULK, HDSP Warden
Gustavo Alvarez v. State of California, et al
as 17-15062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUSTAVO ALVAREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON and others
Alvarez v. State of California et al
as 2:2014cv01181
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Alvarez
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections, High Desert State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Israel Briceno v. F. Fulk, et al
as 13-56180
Petitioner - Appellant:
ISRAEL BALDENEBRO BRICENO
Respondent - Appellee:
F. FULK and HDSP WARDEN
Israel Baldenebro Briceno v. HDSP Warden et al
as 2:2013cv00823
Petitioner:
Israel Baldenebro Briceno
Respondent:
F Fulk and HDSP Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
