Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Herbert Warden v. J. Terris, et al
as 14-5558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT G. WARDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. A. TERRIS, Warden, DR. RIOS, DR. GROWSE and others
Herbert Christensen, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 14-5485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT SAMUEL CHRISTENSEN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DEBORAH HICKEY, Warden, et al
Herbert Warden v. J.A. Terris, et al
as 14-5483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT G. WARDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. A. TERRIS, Warden, DR. RIOS, DR. GROWSE and others
Willie Means v. Deborah Hickey
as 13-6535
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE CLAY MEANS, aka Clay Means
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden
Ricardo Gonzales v. Deborah Hickey, et al
as 13-6345
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO K. GONZALES, Military Inmate, FMC Lexington
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden, FMC, Lexington
Respondent:
COMMANDANT, UNITED STATES DISCIPLINARY BARRACKS, FORT LEAVENWORTH, KANSAS
Joseph Luney v. Deborah Hickey, et al
as 13-6137
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTHONY LUNEY
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden, Federal Medical Center in Lexington, Kentucky added per D.E. 4
Respondent:
JACK CONWAY, for the Commonwealth of Kentucky added per D.E. 4
Joseph Booker v. Marc Holbrook, et al
as 13-5279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH BOOKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MARC HOLBROOK, Medical Doctor, MICHAEL GROWSE, MD-CD and DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden
Herbert Warden v. Jason Terris, et al
as 12-6359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT G. WARDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON TERRIS, Associate Warden, RIOS, GROWSE and others
Rodney Riddell v. Deborah Hickey
as 12-5634
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODNEY RIDDELL
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBORAH HICKEY, Warden
Marquis Heard v. Deborah Hickey
as 12-5492
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARQUIS DERON HEARD
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
