Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LI v. SUSHI TO GO CHERRY HILL,LLC et al
as 1:2022cv04734
Plaintiff:
SAM LI
Defendant:
SUSHI TO GO CHERRY HILL,LLC, JOHN ZHANG, CINDY "DOE" and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
VAN GELDREN v. 2250 HILL, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv12347
Defendant:
2250 HILL, INC. and SGT. SCRAP IRON & METAL, INC. doing business as SGT. SCRAP, LLC
Plaintiff:
CHARLES VAN GELDREN
Counter Claimant:
SGT. SCRAP IRON & METAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
VAN GELDREN v. 2250 Hill, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv12347
Defendant:
2250 Hill, Inc. and SGT. SCRAP IRON & METAL, INC. d/b/a SGT. SCRAP, LLC agent of SGT. SCRAP, LLC
Plaintiff:
CHARLES VAN GELDREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHRISTINA NULPH v. TURNING POINT HOLDING COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv06089
Defendant:
TURNING POINT OF BRICK, LLC, TURNING POINT OF LONG BRANCH, LLC, TURNING POINT OF MARLTON, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA NULPH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MARTE v. STONY HILL, INC et al
as 2:2018cv03414
Plaintiff:
AMBIORIX MARTE
Defendant:
STONY HILL, INC and JOSEPH SANZARI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SHARMA v. MINE HILL SPARTAN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2017cv06331
Plaintiff:
TARUN SHARMA
Defendant:
MINE HILL SPARTAN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY and CENGIZ UNAL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
AKTAS v. JEFFERSON HILL, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv07826
Plaintiff:
HUSEYIN AKTAS
Defendant:
JEFFERSON HILL, INC., JEFFERSON EXXON, JOHN YUCEL and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. A.C.E. RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv07149
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
A.C.E. RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. , A.C.E. RESTAURANT GROUP OF NEW YORK, LLC. , BAYONNE RESTAURANT LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
MURA et al v. BOROUGH OF ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS
as 2:2011cv06433
Plaintiff:
SCOTT MURA , TOD J. COLETTA , NICHOLAS DRIMONES and others
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
