Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Ferrara v. Airgas Merchant Gases, LLC, as successor to AGA Gas, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv05258
Plaintiff:
Michael R Ferrara
Defendant:
Airgas Merchant Gases, LLC, as successor to AGA Gas, Inc., Georgia Pacific, LLC, Hobart Brothers Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shew v. A W Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2010cv00231
Plaintiff:
Barbara L Shew
Defendant:
A W Chesterton Company, Airgas Merchant Gases LLC, Foster Wheeler Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Sweet et al v. A. W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2009cv03870
Plaintiff:
Barbara A Sweet
Defendant:
A. W. Chesterton Company, Airgas Merchant Gases, Asten-Johnson, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Sobierajski v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 2:2008cv00348
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sobierajski
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company, Asten-Johnson Inc, BSM Optical Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gann v. AGA Gas Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00125
Estate Plaintiff:
Judith Gann
Defendant:
AGA Gas Inc, AW Chesterton Company, Anchor Packing Co and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Dix et al v. General Electric Co et al
as 2:2008cv00033
Plaintiff:
Raymond C Dix and Linda L Dix
Defendant:
General Electric Co, AGA Gas Inc, Crown Cork and Seal Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Jones v. General Electric Co et al
as 2:2007cv00260
Estate Plaintiff:
Barbara Jones
Defendant:
General Electric Co, AGA Gas Inc, Allied Crane Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Lundegreen v. Airco/The Boc Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02943
Plaintiff:
Steven Lundegreen
Defendant:
Airco/The Boc Group, Inc., Airco/The Boc Group, Inc., Airco/The Boc Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
