Cases 31 - 40 of 131
Burke et al v. Home Box Office, Inc.
as 1:2018cv10875
Plaintiff:
Eliezer Ruiz, Winston Hamilton, Gregory Burke and others
Defendant:
Home Box Office, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv08165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Coleman v. Home Box Office, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03510
Defendant:
HBO Films and Home Box Office, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joe Coleman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Home Box Office, Inc. v. ooShirts Inc.
as 1:2018cv04645
Plaintiff:
Home Box Office, Inc.
Defendant:
ooShirts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Gayle v. Home Box Office, Inc.
as 18-1536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Itoffee R. Gayle
Defendant - Appellee:
Home Box Office, Inc., Rachel Strom, Adam Lazier and others
Sapia et al v. Home Box Office, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01317
Plaintiff:
Michael Sapia , Christian Pellot , Neftali Pellot and others
Defendant:
Home Box Office, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Palin v. The New York Times Company
as 17-3801
Amicus Curiae:
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Buzzfeed, Inc., Home Box Office, Inc and others
Defendant / Appellee:
The New York Times Company
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sarah Palin, an individual
Paul Dehart, et al v. Top Rank, Inc., et al
as 17-56394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL DEHART and RAY HEREDIA
Defendant - Appellee:
TOP RANK, INC., EMMANUEL PACQUIAO, MICHAEL KONCZ and others
Jacqueline Rodriguez, et al v. Top Rank, Inc., et al
as 17-56398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUELINE MORA RODRIGUEZ and GABRIEL IVAN SANTOS, Individually and on Behalf of all other similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
TOP RANK, INC., ROBERT ARUM, MICHAEL KONCZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
