Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Cleaver et al v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04921
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cleaver, James Cleaver and Bonnie Cleaver
Defendant:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Vac-Con, Inc., HOLDEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paw v. ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv04256
Plaintiff:
Thay Kaw Paw
Defendant:
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC, ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL GROUP, INC., ARAMARK and others
Cross Defendant:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., HONEYWELL SAFETY PRODUCTS USA, INC., JBS S.A. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
A-D2 SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
GERGEL v. HAL ROACH CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03127
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GERGEL
Defendant:
HAL ROACH CONSTRUCTION, INC., HAL ROACH COMPANIES, NORTH AMERICAN MFG. CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GERGEL v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv01624
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GERGEL
Defendant:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., JOHN DOE (1), JOHN DOE (2) and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
COOPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv69950
Plaintiff:
ALLEN COOPER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, ASARCO INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DAVIDSON, et al v. BORG WARNER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00940
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL TRUCK & ENGINE CORP., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., BRIGGS-STRATTON CORP. and others
Cross Defendant:
BORG WARNER CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
COLEEN M. DAVIDSON and THOMAS J. DAVIDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDONOUGH et al v. BORG WARNER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00939
Plaintiff:
DONALD W. MCDONOUGH and CHARLOTTE H. MCDONOUGH
Defendant:
BORG WARNER CORPORATION, BRIGGS-STRATTON CORP., DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
