Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Paul Poupart v. Howard Prince, Warden
as 17-30411
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL POUPART
Respondent - Appellee:
HOWARD PRINCE, WARDEN, ELAYN HUNT CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Guy Boudreaux, Jr. v. Howard Prince, Warden
as 17-30120
Petitioner - Appellant:
GUY BOUDREAUX, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
HOWARD PRINCE, WARDEN, ELAYN HUNT CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Clarence Jack v. Howard Prince, Warden
as 16-31208
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE JACK
Respondent - Appellee:
HOWARD PRINCE, WARDEN, ELAYN HUNT CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Mark Savoy v. Howard Prince, Warden
as 16-31121
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK JAMES SAVOY
Respondent - Appellee:
HOWARD PRINCE, WARDEN, ELAYN HUNT CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Brandon Dorsey v. Howard Prince, Warden
as 16-31082
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRANDON DORSEY
Respondent - Appellee:
HOWARD PRINCE, WARDEN, ELAYN HUNT CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Lawrence Hall v. Howard Prince
as 14-30968
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAWRENCE HALL
Respondent - Appellee:
HOWARD PRINCE, Warden, Elayn Hunt Correctional Center
Robert Wilkerson, et al v. Richard Stalder, et al
as 13-31289
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT KING WILKERSON, ALBERT WOODFOX, VICTORY WALLACE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JERRY GOODWIN, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacity, JAMES ARNOLD, Deputy Warden of Security, David Wade Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities, LONNIE NAIL, Lieutenant Colonel, David Wade Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities and others
Keith Davis v. Howard Prince
as 13-30127
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
HOWARD PRINCE, Warden, Elayn Hunt Correctional Center
Andrew Wetzel v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections, et al
as 13-30056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW DAVID WETZEL
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BOBBY JINDAL, Governor, JAMES LEBLANC, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
