Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Jean Wright v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 17-15685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEAN ANN WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
Remington et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Remington, MD and Amanda Remington
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and ABC Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PPD Enterprises, LLC v. Mako Surgical Corporation et al
as 8:2017mc00112
Plaintiff:
PPD Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Mako Surgical Corporation , Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Movant:
Corin USA Limited, Co.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Pelton v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 8:2017cv01546
Plaintiff:
Stewart C. Pelton
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wright v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 5:2017cv00459
Plaintiff:
Jean Ann Wright
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 6:2017cv01133
Plaintiff:
Jean Ann Wright
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marvel v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 8:2017cv01109
Plaintiff:
Susan Marvel
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.,
as 1:2017cv00753
Plaintiff:
Sara Thompson
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., and Howmedica Osteonics Corp., doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics doing business as Stryker Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Landis v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 5:2017cv00202
Plaintiff:
Beverly Landis
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Telgener v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv01628
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Telgener
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Corp.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
