Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Mussman v. D.A. Dodd Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
Rhys Mussman
Defendant:
D.A. Dodd Inc., Scott M. Keller, Natasha A. Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02879
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01938
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Wilkes et al v. HSBC Card Services, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Wilkes and Melissa Wilkes
Defendant:
HSBC Card Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
M. JEWELL, LLC v. SMITH, JR. et al
as 1:2013cv02055
Defendant:
AEGIS WHOLESALE CORP., AMERICA'S WHOLESALE LENDER, AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
M. JEWELL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PAR 5 CONTRACTING, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00951
Defendant:
AF GLOBAL REVEST INDEMNITY TRUST, DARIUS XAVIER JOHNSON, DIAMOND INDEMNITY TRUST and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
FANCHER v. HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES INC.
as 4:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
EMILY FANCHER
Defendant:
HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
