Cases 21 - 30 of 80
RUFFOLO et al v. HSBC BANK USA, N.A. et al
as 3:2014cv00638
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO FRANCESCO RUFFOLO and CHRISTINE RUFFOLO
Defendant:
HSBC BANK USA, N.A., AMERICAN BROKERS CONDUIT, WELLS FARGO ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv06921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
PETERSON et al v. THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 3:2013cv02011
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH D. PETERSON
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Movant:
MICHAEL B. GALLAGHER and HSBC BANK USA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
In re: Deborah D. Peterson, et al.
as 1:2013mc00107
Movant:
HSBC Bank USA N.A. and Nancy Hedges
Respondent:
Deborah D. Peterson
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Ojofeitimi
as 1:2013cv00354
Plaintiff:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Defendant:
Emmanuel A Ojofeitimi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BA et al v. HSBC USA, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
MORIBA BA , DONALD CHIPP , SHERRICA CHIPP and others
Defendant:
HSBC USA, INC. , HSBC BANK USA, N.A. , HSBC MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 260
VERMA v. HSBC BANK USA, N.A.
as 2:2012cv07464
Plaintiff:
ARUN VERMA
Defendant:
HSBC BANK USA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FREY v. HSBC BANK USA, N.A. et al
as 2:2012cv02176
Plaintiff:
SHELLY FREY
Defendant:
HSBC BANK USA, N.A. , EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
