Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Jones v. HSBC USA Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv00835
Plaintiff:
Annette Jones
Defendant:
HSBC USA Bank, N.A. and HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc.
Parker et al v. HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.
as 1:2013cv00682
Plaintiff:
Donald Parker and Vera Parker
Defendant:
HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.
Harris et al v. HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.
as 2:2013cv00019
Plaintiff:
Raymond Harris, Sr. and Mary C. Harris
Defendant:
HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
McGann v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Lynford D. McGann
Defendant:
HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. , McCurdy & Candler, LLC , THR Georgia LP and others
Jackson-Brooks et al v. HSBC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00080
Plaintiff:
Eileen Jackson-Brooks
Defendant:
HSBC Mortgage Corporation , HSBC Mortgage Service, Inc. , Household Realty Corp. and others
Remy v. HSBC Mortgage Services Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04417
Plaintiff:
Rachelle R. Remy
Defendant:
HSBC Mortgage Services Inc. , Aldridge Connors LLP, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Crowder et al v. HSBC Mortgage Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Crowder and Brenna Crowder
Defendant:
HSBC Mortgage Service, Inc. , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , McCurdy & Candler LLC and others
Edwards v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc.
as 1:2012cv04162
Plaintiff:
Denise Edwards
Defendant:
HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc.
DeKalb County et al v. HSBC North America Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03640
Plaintiff:
DeKalb County , Fulton County and Cobb County, Georgia
Defendant:
HSBC North America Holdings Inc., HSBC Investments North America Inc., HSBC Finance Corporation and others
HENRY v. CALUSA INVESTMENTS LLC et al
as 5:2012cv00309
Plaintiff:
GEORGE W HENRY
Defendant:
CALUSA INVESTMENTS LLC, HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES INC and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
