Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Haddad v. Comcast of Arkansas Louisiana Minnesota Mississippi Tennessee
as 3:2022cv02625
Plaintiff:
Freddie Haddad
Defendant:
Comcast of Arkansas Florida Louisiana Minnesota Mississippi Tennessee, Comcast of Arkansas Louisiana Minnesota Mississippi Tennessee L L C doing business as Comcast Corp, Comcast Cable Communications Management L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Edmond v. Haddad et al
as 6:2020cv01449
Defendant:
Lafayette Parish Correctional Center and Joshua Haddad
Plaintiff:
Xavier Edmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haddad v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 2:2019cv13581
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rose Haddad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haddad v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 2:2017cv16236
Plaintiff:
Alizabeth Haddad
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc., Hospira, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haddad v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv13624
Plaintiff:
Brenda Haddad
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haddad et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc et al
as 6:2013cv00523
Plaintiff:
George R Haddad and Doris L Haddad
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Takeda Pharmaceuticals L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fletcher v. Broadmoor/Womack Joint Venture et al
as 2:2012cv00763
Plaintiff:
Munson Fletcher
Defendant:
Broadmoor/Womack Joint Venture, Providence Community Housing, Randall Phillip Haddad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haddad, et al. v. Chesapeake Exploration L L C
as 5:2008cv01834
Defendant:
Chesapeake Exploration L L C
Plaintiff:
George Andrew Haddad, et al.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
