Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Laurel Gardens LLC, et al v. Timothy McKenna, et al
as 23-2649
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAUREL GARDENS LLC, AMERICAN WINTER SERVICES LLC, LAUREL GARDENS HOLDINGS LLC and others
Defendant:
TIMOTHY MCKENNA, MAT SITE MANAGEMENT LLC, EAISE DESIGN & LANDSCAPING LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MCKENNA, BOBBY AERENSON, GREGORY PETTINARO and others
In re: Terrance Phillips
as 22-1037
Petitioner:
In re: TERRANCE PHILLIPS
Defendant / Appellee:
MOSER
Respondent:
KEITH A. PESTO and STEPHANIE L. HAINES
USA v. Richard Haines, Jr.
as 21-1977
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD HAINES, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lavond HillIn re: Lavond Hill
as 21-1783
Respondent:
J. JONES, JOHN E. WETZEL, D. CLOSE and others
Petitioner:
In re: LAVOND HILL
Haines v. Nutrisystem, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00137
Defendant:
Benjamin A. Kirshner, Michael D. Mangan, Michael J. Hagan and others
Plaintiff:
Lora Haines
Tannor Partners Credit Fund L.P. v. Haining Oyi May Sofia Co., Ltd.
as 1:2018mc00314
Defendant:
Haining Oyi May Sofia Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Tannor Partners Credit Fund L.P.
Tannor Partners Credit Fund L.P. v. Haining Home Craft Furniture Co., Ltd.
as 1:2018mc00264
Defendant:
Haining Home Craft Furniture Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Tannor Partners Credit Fund L.P.
USA v. Anthony Haines
as 17-3772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY HAINES
LAUREL GARDENS, LLC et al v. MCKENNA et al
as 5:2017cv00570
Plaintiff:
LAUREL GARDENS, LLC , AMERICAN WINTER SERVICES, LLC , LAUREL GARDEN HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Defendant:
TIMOTHY MCKENNA, MICHAEL MCKENNA, MAT SITE MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
