Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01830
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01380
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barnes v. Karabeika et al
as 3:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
Gerald LeRoy Barnes, II
Defendant:
Judge Heather Karabeika and Attorney Linda Haines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gavula et al v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company et al
as 3:2021cv01275
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Gavula and Barbara Wicker
Defendant:
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Campbell Soup Company, Gerber Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Forter et al v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv00478
Plaintiff:
Jacob Phillips, Joseph J. Gustin, III, Jack Caudy and others
Defendant:
Colette S. Peters and Governor Kate Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snyder v. Taylor et al
as 2:2017cv00935
Defendant:
Stacey Borgman, Judge Douglas Van Dyke, Michael Haines and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Joshua Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haines v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00030
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Gerald K. Haines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Friedrick C. Haines
as 3:2016ad00112
In Re:
Friedrick C. Haines
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Haines v. Angelozzi
as 3:2014cv01653
Respondent:
Richard Angelozzi
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Ronnie Lee Haines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haines v. Oliver
as 1:2010cv03027
Plaintiff:
Janette Haines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
