Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hamilton v. Claim Jumper Acquisitions, LLC
as 3:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hamilton
Defendant:
Claim Jumper Acquisitions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Abdeljabbar et al v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2018cv07482
Plaintiff:
Odeh Abdeljabbar, Eder Berganza, Dexter Baldridge II and others
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Rios et al v. Bill Hamilton Roofing, Inc et al
as 5:2018cv03845
Plaintiff:
Joaquin V Rios , Jose Rios , Joaquin E Rios and others
Defendant:
Bill Hamilton Roofing, Inc. and Bill Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Ryan et al v. City of San Jose
as 5:2018cv01390
Plaintiff:
Francis Ryan , Gilbert Posada , Hau Pham and others
Defendant:
City of San Jose
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Rodriguez et al v. Credico (USA) LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01221
Plaintiff:
Rodriguez, Mante Rodriguez, Crystal Hamilton Peterson and others
Defendant:
Credico (USA) LLC, Red Tower Marketing, Inc. and Diana Rojas
Interested Party:
Tashian Scott
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alviso et al v. City of San Rafael
as 3:2016cv07056
Plaintiff:
Anthony Alviso , Sam Achondo , Melissa Ainsworth and others
Defendant:
City of San Rafael
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Matt Jackson et al v. City of West Covina et al
as 2:2016cv08963
Plaintiff:
Peter Aguilar, Marco A. Arredondo, Adam Berger and others
Defendant:
City of West Covina and Does
Hamilton v. DS Services of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv04735
Plaintiff:
Nicole Hamilton
Defendant:
DS Services of America, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Antonio Acfalle et al v. DIRECTV Inc et al
as 2:2013cv08108
Plaintiff:
Antonio Acfalle, Ernesto Alanis, Jr, Eric Aldrich and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV Inc, DIRECTV LLC, DTV Home Services II LLC and others
Hilda L. Solis v. Lifestyle Landscapes, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01522
Defendant:
Lann D. Hamilton, Lifestyle Companies, Inc., Lifestyle Landscapes, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
