Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 67
SHAW v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00538
Plaintiff: PATTI HAMMOND SHAW
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, BENJAMIN E. KATES, STEVE CONBOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2012cv00432
Plaintiff: PATTI HAMMOND SHAW
Defendant: UNITED STATES, BENJAMIN E. KATES, STEVE CONBOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAVEZ et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00359
Plaintiff: ANA CHAVEZ , KATHY CANNON , ROBIN BELL and others
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Oscar Dantzler v. EEOC, et al
as 12-5060
Plaintiff - Appellant: Oscar Dantzler
Defendant - Appellee: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Keith Hills, Agent Does One-Five and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00188
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5006
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
SHAW v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00946
Plaintiff: PATTI HAMMOND SHAW
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2011cv00947
Plaintiff: PATTI HAMMOND SHAW
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Navarro Hammond
as 10-3096
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant - Appellant: Navarro A. Hammond
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02147
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?