Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Jennifer Fleece v. Board of Trustees of the Hancock Regional Hospital
as 23-3363
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JENNIFER FLEECE
Defendant / Appellant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CHILDERS et al v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL
as 1:2023cv01471
Plaintiff:
SHERRY CHILDERS and DIANA POLSTON
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
FLEECE v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL
as 1:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER FLEECE
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
USA v. Patrick Hancock
as 22-2614
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PATRICK HANCOCK
USA v. Bradley Hancock
as 21-1725
Defendant / Appellant:
BRADLEY J. HANCOCK
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Richard Blevins, et al v. International Brotherhood of T, et al
as 20-2977
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RICHARD BLEVINS, EDDIE RIZZO, GERALD JANES, JR. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, International Union and TERRY HANCOCK
USA v. Patrick Hancock
as 20-2386
Defendant / Appellant:
PATRICK HANCOCK
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Levan Galleries LLC v. City of Chicago, et al
as 19-1709
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN WILLIAMS, TIMOTHY J. FLISK, TIMOTHY E. CERVEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVAN GALLERIES LLC and JEMAL LAVAN HANCOCK
Jemal Hancock, et al v. Sotheby's Incorporated, et al
as 19-1144
Defendant / Appellee:
BENJAMIN DOLLER, SOTHEBY'S, formerly known as SOTHEBY'S HOLDINGS INCORPORATED and SOTHEBY'S INCORPORATED
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAVAN GALLERIES LLC and JEMAL LAVAN HANCOCK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
