Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Corcoran v. Hancock et al
as 1:2010cv24097
Plaintiff:
William Corcoran
Defendant:
Glen E. Hancock and Steve Roddenberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORCORAN v MCNEIL et al
as 5:2010cv00297
Plaintiff:
William Corcoran and VINCENT RIVERA
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEIL, JOHN PALMER, JOHN BARFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corcoran v. Rivera et al
as 3:2010cv01025
Plaintiff:
William Corcoran and Vincent Rivera
Defendant:
Walter McNeil, John Palmer, John Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehead v. Shoar et al
as 3:2010cv00542
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Valentina Whitehead
Defendant:
David B. Shoar, St. Johns County Detention Center and R. Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSES v. MCNEIL
as 3:2008cv00393
Plaintiff:
RONALD MOSES
Defendant:
WALTER A MCNEIL, WENDALL WHITEHURST, D ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Damien D. Jones v. McNeil et al
as 3:2008cv00761
Plaintiff:
Damien D. Jones
Defendant:
Walter McNeil, Sandeep Rahangdale, Paul C. Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corines v. Broward County, et al
as 0:2005cv61115
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Corines
Defendant:
Unknown Named Agents, et al, Fort Lauderdale Police and Marine Division, R. Blish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Hancock, et al.
as 3:2007cv01146
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
Officer Hancock, U.C.I. Mental Health and U.C.I. Secretary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Hancock et al
as 3:2007cv01147
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
Officer Hancock, U.C.I. Mental Health and U.C.I. Secretary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv00574
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Jeffery Fair
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, R. Hall, J. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
