Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kono et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Casey Kono, David Velasquez, Jonathan Griffith and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Camacho et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02228
Plaintiff:
Jason Bowers, King Brian, Thomas Babb and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Karidis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02227
Plaintiff:
William Herr, Donald Hammock, Austin Kang and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Hall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02074
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas, Tony Campbell, James Hartson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Hanks v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv05052
Plaintiff:
Julie Hanks
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanke v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv00964
Plaintiff:
Diane Hanke
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kalb et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 0:2013cv03357
Plaintiff:
Hank Kalb and Theresa Kalb
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanks v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2011cv01712
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Hanks
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC and Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanks v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv06169
Plaintiff:
John Hanks, John Hanks, John Hanks and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Hanks v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
as 0:2008cv00414
Plaintiff:
Sandra Hanks
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
