Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Hernandez v. Magic Wholesale Co. et al
as 1:2024cv20305
Plaintiff:
Marlenin Hernandez
Defendant:
Magic Wholesale Co. and Hank Yan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Hanks, Jr. v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 1:2023cv24683
Plaintiff:
James Hanks, Jr.
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
WILL v. FIVE & TEN INC et al
as 3:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILL, MEGAN SPARKS and RACHEL BAILEY
Defendant:
FIVE & TEN, INC., HUGH ACHESON, HANK SULLY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hanks et al v. Pritchard Global Security, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv03677
Plaintiff:
Darrien Hanks and Abdoulie Jeng
Defendant:
Pritchard Global Security, LLC and Lorenzo Pritchard
Bamberg v. The Results Companies, LLC
as 0:2020cv61420
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bamberg, Shandellah Martin, Amanda Mesot and others
Defendant:
The Results Companies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McWilson v. North and South Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02448
Plaintiff:
Tyrique McWilson and Deayunte McWilson
Defendant:
North and South Enterprises, LLC, Henry Y. Johnson, Morgana Freeman and others
Hernandez v. HUSA LH JF, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv21204
Defendant:
Garrett Solomon, HUSA LH JF, LLC and Hank Morris
Plaintiff:
Enid Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hernandez v. Solomon et al
as 1:2020cv21193
Defendant:
Garrett Solomon and Hank Morris
Plaintiff:
Enid Hernandez
Aleman Jr v. Regional One, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv20399
Defendant:
Hank Gibson and Regional One, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Humberto Aleman Jr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Milie et al v. City of Savannah
as 4:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
Robert Milie , Terry Alberts, Jr. , Matthew Caples and others
Defendant:
City of Savannah
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
