Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Reynolds v. Utah Highway Patrol et al
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Amanda Reynolds
Defendant:
Utah Highway Patrol, Lane Hooser, Sandy City Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Hanks et al v. Anderson
as 2:2019cv00999
Plaintiff:
RealSource Equity Services and Nathan W. Hanks
Defendant:
Michael S. Anderson, Michael Howard and Kent Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bodyguard Productions v. Griffiths et al.
as 2:2019cv00356
Plaintiff:
Bodyguard Productions
Defendant:
Internet Subscribers 1-8, Mataulufotu Aiono, Lomalinda Tonga and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Evans v. Sandy City et al
as 2:2017cv00408
Plaintiff:
Steve Ray Evans
Defendant:
Sandy City , Tim Dolan , Kevin Thacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Center for Biological Diversity v. Thompson et al
as 2:2016cv00066
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
Ronald W. Thompson, Barbara Hjelle, Corey Cram and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Bame et al v. Iron County et al
as 2:2010cv00890
Plaintiff:
Mildred Bame , Desma R. Auclair , Ronda L. McKinnis and others
Defendant:
Iron County, Iron County Sheriff's Office, Mark O. Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Galetka
as 2:1995cv00846
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Gardner
Defendant:
Hank Galetka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hopkins v. Galetka
as 2:1999cv00652
Petitioner:
Henry C. Hopkins
Respondent:
Hank Galetka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Briar Patch Education LLC v. Filiaga et al
as 2:2009cv00301
Plaintiff:
Briar Patch Education LLC
Defendant:
Fasi Filiaga, Precise Business Solutions, Christopher Lee Hanks and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
