Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Pinson v. Pacheco et al
as 1:2010cv01377
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Robert Pacheco, Sara Revell, Merry Wilner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crump v. Wiley et al
as 1:2010cv00822
Plaintiff:
Norvell Webster Crump
Defendant:
R. Wiley, Harley Lappins, U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdullah v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv02728
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Abdullah
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Davis, Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallett v. Davis et al
as 1:2009cv02448
Petitioner:
Dawane Arthur Mallett
Respondent:
Davis, Harley Lappin and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abdullah v. Lappin
as 1:2009cv02368
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Mustafa Abdullah
Defendant:
Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunbar v. Holder et al
as 1:2009cv02041
Petitioner:
Carlton Dunbar
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Harley Lappin and Randy Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abdullah v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv01990
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Mustafa Abdullah
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Wiley, Manly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01823
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01824
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mallett v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv01784
Petitioner:
Dawane Arthur Mallett
Respondent:
Harley Lappin, R. Wiley and Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
