Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Clarke v. Grayer et al
as 1:2009cv00112
Petitioner:
Gregory L. Clarke
Respondent:
Lauren Grayer, Ray Holt and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mays v. Grayer et al
as 1:2009cv00037
Petitioner:
Erik Mays
Respondent:
Loren Grayer, Ray Holt and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott v. Vasquez et al
as 2:2008cv00145
Plaintiff:
Nelson Scott
Defendant:
Warden Jose Vasquez, Dr. Martha R. Chipi, Director Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCloud v. Grayer et al
as 1:2008cv01611
Plaintiff:
Samuel McCloud
Defendant:
Loren Grayer, R. Holt, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Tsoukalas v. Lappin et al
as 3:2008cv00035
Petitioner:
Georgios Tsoukalas
Respondent:
Harley Lappin and Walt Wells
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Santoro v. Wells et al
as 3:2008cv00022
Petitioner:
Mario F. Santoro
Respondent:
Walt Wells, Harley Lappin and Mukasey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McCloud v. Grayer et al
as 1:2008cv00599
Plaintiff:
Samuel McCloud
Defendant:
Loren Grayer, R. Holt, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Amparo-Tineo v. Lappin et al
as 3:2008cv00002
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Amparo-Tineo
Respondent:
Harley Lappin and Stace Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02764
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Vazquez et al
as 2:2007cv00095
Plaintiff:
Nelson Scott
Defendant:
Jose M. Vazquez, Chippi, United States Of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
