Cases 41 - 50 of 124
BAILEY v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv01439
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, RAYMOND E. HOLT, D.B. DREW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FELTS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv01388
Plaintiff:
KEVIN C. FELTS
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN and M. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KISSI v. SIMMONS et al
as 1:2009cv01377
Plaintiff:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant:
THOMAS SIMMONS, CHRISTINE BARRILLA-NELL, ALLAN STEPHENSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KISSI v. SIMMONS et al
as 1:2009cv01304
Petitioner:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant:
THOMAS SIMMONS
Respondent:
CHRISTINE BARRILLA-NELL, ALLAN STEPHENSON, SHARON GURNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GUADALUPE-TEJADA v. LAPPIN
as 1:2009cv01164
Petitioner:
ROGELIO GUADALUPE-TEJADA
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WATTLETON v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv01108
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN and T. MARSHAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAUER v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv01097
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK W. BAUER
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, MIKE NALLEY, RICARDO RIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POLICHEMI v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2009cv01078
Petitioner:
JOSEPH POLICHEMI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, ERIC HOLDER, US BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BAUER v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv00975
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK W. BAUER
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, MIKE NALLEY, RICARDO RIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv00972
Plaintiff:
MARTIN A. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
