Cases 51 - 60 of 76
Vierra v. Copenhaver et al
as 4:2009cv04280
Petitioner:
Christine C. Vierra
Respondent:
Paul Copenhaver and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mayes v. Copenhaver et al
as 3:2009cv04267
Petitioner:
Kelly Mayes
Respondent:
Paul Copenhaver and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Miller v. Copenhaver et al
as 4:2009cv04083
Plaintiff:
Marcella G. Miller
Defendant:
Paul Copenhaver and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Duenas v. Copenhaver et al
as 3:2009cv04076
Petitioner:
Cynthia Duenas
Respondent:
Paul Copenhaver and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beltran v. Copenhaver et al
as 3:2009cv04034
Petitioner:
Yolanda Beltran
Respondent:
Paul Copenhaver and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Foster v. Copenhaver et al
as 3:2009cv04002
Petitioner:
Lisa Foster
Respondent:
Paul Copenhaver and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cummins v. Copenhaver et al
as 3:2009cv04007
Petitioner:
Susan Elizabeth Cummins
Respondent:
Paul Copenhaver and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Murguia v. Copenhaver et al
as 3:2009cv03944
Petitioner:
Rosa Maria Murguia
Respondent:
Paul Copenhaver and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Tan v. Copenhaver et al
as 4:2009cv03905
Petitioner:
Christy Tan
Respondent:
Paul Copenhaver and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lee v. Copenhaver et al
as 3:2009cv03906
Petitioner:
Julie Lee
Respondent:
Paul Copenhaver and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
