Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Koller v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv04534
Plaintiff:
Scott Koller
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group, LLC and Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Garcia v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.
as 3:2019cv02054
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. and Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ronald Garcia and Michiel Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meyer et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 3:2011cv06382
Plaintiff:
Ruth Ann Meyer and Clayton Meyer
Defendant:
General Electric Company, CBS Corporation, Foster Wheeler LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv05254
Plaintiff:
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
Barnes & Noble, Inc. , J. C. Penney Company, Inc. , Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
as 4:2010cv05254
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., The Dress Barn, Inc., Kirkland's Stores, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Sigma Designs, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Kwan Chan
Intervenor:
Intel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Holland et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 4:2009cv05713
Plaintiff:
Joe Holland and Mary Roberta Holland
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, American Standard, Inc., Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Holland et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2009cv05713
Plaintiff:
Joe Holland and Mary Roberta Holland
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, American Standard, Inc., Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
