Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lonnie HarnessIn re: Lonnie Harness
as 23-5277
Petitioner:
In re: LONNIE HARNESS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gail Harness v. Anderson County, TN
as 21-5710
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAIL HARNESS
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDERSON COUNTY, TN
Defendant:
WILLIAM T. JONES
Erman Harness v. Anderson County, Tennessee, et al
as 20-5212
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY ALLEN, CORPORAL ROBERTS, NURSE HUDSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERMAN L. HARNESS
Keith Harness, et al v. Jonathan Taft, et al
as 19-5484
Defendant / Appellee:
JONATHAN P. TAFT and RAYMOND E. TOWNSEND
Plaintiff:
KARI MARCUM HARNESS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH E. HARNESS
End-Payor Plaintiffs, et al v. Nippon Seiki Company, Ltd., et al
as 16-2085
:
In re: WIRE HARNESSES
Plaintiff - Appellee:
END-PAYOR PLAINTIFFS
Interested Party - Appellant:
OLEN YORK
Defendant - Appellee:
NIPPON SEIKI COMPANY, LTD., N.S. INTERNATIONAL, LTD., NEW SABINA INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
End-Payor Plaintiffs, et al v. Nippon Seiki Company, Ltd., et al
as 16-2081
:
In re: WIRE HARNESSES
Plaintiff - Appellee:
END-PAYOR PLAINTIFFS
Interested Party - Appellant:
BENJAMIN FEURY and THOMAS SARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
NIPPON SEIKI COMPANY, LTD., N.S. INTERNATIONAL, LTD., NEW SABINA INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Partners In Forestry Coop, et al v. United States Forest Service, et al
as 14-2444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PARTNERS IN FORESTRY COOPERATIVE, NORTHWOOD ALLIANCE, INC., JOE HOVEL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, ROBERT D. DELICH and LISA DELICH
David Agema, et al v. City of Allegan, et al
as 13-1529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID AGEMA, State Representative, ELIZABETH GRIFFIN, MARK GURLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLEGAN, CITY OF, ROB HILLIARD, City Manager, City of Allegan, RICK HOYER, Chief of Police, City of Allegan and others
Suzann Barlow v. Edward Adams, et al
as 09-1753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUZANN BARLOW
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD C. ADAMS and K. L. HARRING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
