Cases 1 - 10 of 13
USA v. Loera
as 23-10361
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Gerardo Haro Loera
USA v. Castellanos-Haro
as 22-50717
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jorge Castellanos-Haro
Kanat Umarbaev, et al v. Marc Moore, et al
as 20-10781
Petitioner / Appellant:
Patricia Esteban Ramon, Juan Francisco Portillo Hernandez, Jane Doe and others
Respondent / Appellee:
Marc J. Moore, Dallas Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jimmy Johnson, Warden, Prairieland Detention Center and others
USA v. Sandra Haro
as 17-40539
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SANDRA HARO
USA v. Ruben Haro
as 16-40130
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RUBEN HARO
USA v. Juan Martinez-Haro
as 15-50376
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS MARTINEZ-HARO
Steven Ferguson v. M. Bragg, et al
as 13-50892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN M. FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN M. TRAVIS BRAGG, LEO LAWRENCE ALTENBERG, Medical Doctor, Clinical Director, RODRIGO CHAVEZ, Health Services Administrator and others
Steven Ferguson v. M. Bragg, et al
as 13-50439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN M. FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN M. TRAVIS BRAGG, LEO LAWRENCE ALTENBERG, Medical Doctor, Clinical Director, RODRIGO CHAVEZ, Health Services Administrator and others
USA v. Ramiro Ramirez-Haro
as 12-51030
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAMIRO RAMIREZ-HARO
Kamal Patel v. Ronald Thompson, et al
as 10-11061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL PATEL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH HARO, Warden - FCI Big Spring, W. A. SHERROD, Associate Warden, TREVINO TAPIA, Associate Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
