Cases 21 - 30 of 233
Perez, et al. v. Darling Ingredients, Inc., et al.
as 1:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Mauricia Perez, Angela Cruz, Juan Cruz and others
Defendant:
John Does I - X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Haro v. CSAA General Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv00676
Plaintiff:
Beatriz Haro
Defendant:
CSAA General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
(PC) Haro v. Nguyen et al
as 1:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Johnny Joe Haro
Defendant:
T. Nguyen, Kai-Chin Jeng and Gordon Lai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haro-Aguilar v. Garland
as 22-591
Petitioner:
JAVIER RAFAEL HARO-AGUILAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Haro-Banuelos v. Garland
as 22-260
Petitioner:
SERGIO IVAN HARO-BANUELOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Priscilla Aguilar et al v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv09403
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Aguilar, Julian Haro, Juan Madera and others
Defendant:
Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc. and DOES 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Sergio Haro
as 21-10358
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SERGIO ANTONIO HARO
Sam Colby v. Javier Haro et al
as 2:2021cv09017
Plaintiff:
Sam Colby doing business as Eden Machinery
Defendant:
Javier Haro, Sr, Does 1-20 and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Leprinceton Burks v. Los Angeles Police Department, et al
as 21-56213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEPRINCETON DEWON BURKS, AKA Dapper P, AKA P, AKA Pete Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRADLEY SCHUMACHER, 33696 Police Officer, in official capacity, MARTIN PINNER, 27242, Detective, in official capacity and others
USA v. Sergio Haro
as 21-10280
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SERGIO ANTONIO HARO
Appellant:
ERIN MICHELLE CARRILLO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
