Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Wesley Earnest v. Keith Davis
as 23-6934
Petitioner / Appellant:
WESLEY BRIAN EARNEST
Respondent / Appellee:
KEITH W. DAVIS, Warden and HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections
Kareem Olatuwan, Sr. v. Dr. Ofagh
as 21-7704
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREEM AKEEM OLATUWAN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. OFAGH, Mediko, PC, STUART BROTH, Dentist, Mediko, PC, DIXIE DELUTIS, Health Service Administrator, Mediko, PC and others
Michael Gorbey v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6800
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Michael Gorbey v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6654
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Jeffrey Pleasant v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6398
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, KAREN D. BROWN, Chair, Virginia Parole Board and WENDY K. BROWN, Legal Services Community Release Manager for the Virginia Department of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY A. PLEASANT
Steven Calleja, Jr. v. Harold Clark
as 21-6074
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARK, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN PAUL CALLEJA, JR.
Jowarski Nedd v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6026
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOWARSKI RUSSELL NEDD
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
George Brandon v. Harold Clarke
as 20-7833
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE BRANDON
Brandon Thomas v. Harold Clarke
as 20-7550
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRANDON WAYNE THOMAS
Kalen Nielsen v. Harold Clarke
as 20-7549
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
KALEN JOSEPH NIELSEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
