Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Harris v. Armada MI OPCO LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10319
Plaintiff:
Ashley Harris
Defendant:
Armada MI OPCO LLC, Armada Village MI Wellness LLC, Harper Woods MI OPCO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kaki et al v. Tenet Healthcare Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv10004
Defendant:
VHS of Michigan, Inc. dba Detroit Medical Center, John Levy, VHS Harper-Hutzel Hospital, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
M.D. Amir Kaki and M.D. Mahir Elder
Harper v. Procorp, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv11678
Defendant:
Downriver Staffing Group, LLC, Procorp, LLC and Timothy Schultz
Plaintiff:
Raynald Harper
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Estate of Harper Samuel et al v. CIGNA Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv13485
Plaintiff:
David Samuel and Estate of Harper Samuel
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company Of North America, CIGNA Group Insurance and CIGNA Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
AFSCME Council 25 and its Affiliated Locals 140, 180 and 3695 v. Detroit Medical Center et al
as 2:2014cv13770
Plaintiff:
AFSCME Council 25 and its Affiliated Locals 140, 180 and 3695
Defendant:
Detroit Medical Center , Detroit Receiving Hospital , University Health Center and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Harper-Hutzel Hospital v. Black
as 2:2012cv12571
Plaintiff:
Harper-Hutzel Hospital
Defendant:
Karen Black
Thirdparty_defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota and Archway Marketing Services, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Karen Black
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Harper v. General Motors Corporation
as 1:2008cv00220
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Harper
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Harris et al
as 2:2007cv12342
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Margaret Harris, Essie Mae Harper and Cantrell Funeral Home, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
