Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Redbird Business Group, et al v. Harrison
as 24-7039
Counter Defendant:
REDBIRD BUSINESS GROUP, LLC, REDBIRD BIOSCIENCE OKLAHOMA, LLC and RB REALTYCO, LLC
Counter Claimant:
MATTHEW HARRISON
In re: Adams, et al
as 24-4026
Petitioner:
LARRY ADAMS, JED R. CHRISTENSEN, KIRK R. HARRISON and others
Respondent:
ROY NIELSEN HAFEN and WILLIAM T. THURMAN
Massey v. Computershare Limited, et al
as 24-1095
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARRISON MASSEY
Defendant:
COMPUTERSHARE LIMITED, AKA Computershare, Inc., AKA Computershare US, Inc., BANK OF AMERICA, NA and SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC, AKA Computershare Loan Services
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-2181
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA, SARA BENSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC.
United States v. Harrison
as 23-6177
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE HARRISON, JR.
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-705
Petitioner:
STEVE OKSTAD, MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA and others
Respondent:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. and REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC.
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al v. Dunn, et al
as 23-706
Petitioner:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Respondent:
ANTHONY DUNN, CEYHAN HAKSAL, MICHAEL ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1222
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States v. Harrison
as 23-6028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
JARED MICHAEL HARRISON
Tallie v. Pittsburg Police Department, et al
as 23-3000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH N. TALLIE
Defendant / Appellee:
PITTSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, ADAN NANCE, LORI BOLTON-FLEMING and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
