Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Guardino v. Hart et al
as 4:2021cv03721
Plaintiff:
Kristin Guardino
Defendant:
Jim Hart, Sean H McCarthy, John Eddie Williams, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01479
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc. v. Hart
as 4:2021cv00648
Defendant:
John Hart
Plaintiff:
Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc.
Morgan v. Technical Automation Services Corp et al
as 4:2017mc01578
Plaintiff:
George Cleron Morgan
Defendant:
Technical Automation Services Corp, Kelsey Hart and Tosia Crowe
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Federal Trade Commission v. Liberty Supply Co. d/b/a Omni Services et al
as 4:2015mc02962
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Liberty Supply Co. d/b/a Omni Services, Mia L McCrary, John B Hart and others
Receiver:
Charlene C Koonce
Haase v. Elliott et al
as 4:2015cv03473
Plaintiff:
Richard Alan Haase
Defendant:
Brady Elliott, Fort Bend County, Roy L Cordes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Bulawa et al
as 4:2014cv03343
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ellis
Defendant:
Bryan F. Bulawa, William Ordemann, Robert D. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nathan Smith v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2012cv00469
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Dick Schwartz , Law office of Schwartz Junnell Greenberg and Oatout Esq and others
Counter_claimant:
Law office of Schwartz Junnell Greenberg and Oatout Esq
Counter_defendant:
Nathan Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv04496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
