Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Pena v. Sarma Collections Inc et al
as 3:2020cv01865
Defendant:
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Sarma Collections Inc and Edinburg Radiology
Plaintiff:
Melissa Pena
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shams v. Hillcrest Davidson and Associates et al
as 3:2020cv01871
Defendant:
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Hillcrest Davidson and Associates, Boss Exotics, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Imran Shams, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated and Imran Shams
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pena v. The Bureaus Inc et al
as 3:2020cv01868
Defendant:
Terrill Outsourcing Group LLC doing business as Superlative RM, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, The Bureaus Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa Pena
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00606
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00271
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Berry v. Quality Asset Recovery, LLC et al
as 6:2020cv00247
Defendant:
Quality Asset Recovery, LLC, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company and DTI Investments, Inc
Plaintiff:
Mardasia Berry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
