Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HAWTHORN SUITES FRANCHISING, INC. et al v. TASACOM REAL ESTATE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv16786
Plaintiff:
HAWTHORN SUITES FRANCHISING, INC., WYNDHAM HOTEL GROUP, LLC and WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Defendant:
TASACOM REAL ESTATE LLC d/b/a HAWTHORN SUITES DALLAS LOVE FIELD, SANJEEV JAIN, MOHAMMAD SADIQ NOSHAHI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HAWTHORN SUITES FRANCHISING, INC. v. GVL HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv09256
Defendant:
VISHNU REDDY, MEGHAJ REDDY, VIJITHA REDDY and others
Plaintiff:
HAWTHORN SUITES FRANCHISING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAWTHORN SUITES FRANCHISING, INC. v. GIRI FRANKLIN, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv05192
Plaintiff:
HAWTHORN SUITES FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
UMESH ARORA, TERATH BAJAJ, GIRI FRANKLIN, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAWTHORN SUITES FRANCHISING, INC. v. RUSHIL HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv11933
Plaintiff:
HAWTHORN SUITES FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
RUSHIL HOSPITALITY, LLC, KAMLESH PATEL and RASIK PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. ELPIZO, R.I., L.P. et al
as 2:2015cv02519
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MOORE
Defendant:
ELPIZO, R.I., L.P., IPAX, R.I.., INC., PHILEO RI, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAWTHORN SUITES FRANCHISING, INC. v. PATEL
as 2:2014cv03072
Plaintiff:
HAWTHORN SUITES FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
PRADIP PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAWTHORN SUITES FRANCHISING, INC. v. MERIDEN ONE LODGING, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv05893
Plaintiff:
HAWTHORN SUITES FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
MERIDEN ONE LODGING, LLC and JONATHAN KERR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAWTHORN SUITES FRANCHISING, INC. v. AJAM, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05492
Plaintiff:
HAWTHORN SUITES FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
AJAM, INC., UPAMANYU RAVAL, NEHA RAVAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
