Cases 41 - 50 of 60
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Amella et al
as 1:2011cv06849
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Stephen P Amella and Andre J Hayden
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Armstrong v. Hayden
as 1:2011cv06196
Petitioner:
Craig Armstrong
Respondent:
Pat Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hayden v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2011cv12674
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Hayden
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2011cv04925
Plaintiff:
Marcello Moore
Defendant:
Gary McCarthy, Dale R. Kingsley, Steven J. Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Gates et al
as 3:2011cv00529
Plaintiff:
Bryan Thomas
Defendant:
Warden Gates, Debbie Isaacs, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs, et al. v. New Ashley Stewart, Inc.
as 1:2011cv03071
Plaintiff:
Sharon Gibbs, Marilyn Branch, Keisha M. Fulton and others
Defendant:
New Ashley Stewart, Inc. and Urban Brand, Inc. doing business as Ashely Stewart
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hayden-Woods v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv20045
Plaintiff:
Jenean Hayden-Woods
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare, LLC, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayden v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv11456
Plaintiff:
Lori Hayden
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pritchard v. Hayden
as 1:2010cv00301
Petitioner:
Lonnie Pritchard
Respondent:
Pat Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
