Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Liappes v. Fun In Trampoline Park, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00439
Plaintiff: Leah Liappes
Defendant: Fun In Trampoline Park, LLC, Yao Zheng, He Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. He Lin
as 20-5767
Defendant / Appellant: HE LIN
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv06468
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", customerfirst2015, to-the-better and others
Plaintiff: Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Christian Dior Couture, S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv04908
Plaintiff: Christian Dior Couture, S.A.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Li Chen, 454ngyu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Yu et al v. ISG Enterprises Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09888
Plaintiff: Xue Xiang Yu , Qi Zhong Chen and He Lin
Defendant: ISG Enterprises Inc., ABC Corporation, Igor Grinberg and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lin v. Holder
as 13-590
Petitioner: Mao He Lin
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Lin v. Holder
as 12-4980
Petitioner: Zhao He Lin
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Zi Lin v. Atty Gen USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-3655
Petitioner: ZI HE LIN
Respondent: ATTY GEN USA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01113
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11377
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?