Cases 1 - 4 of 4
A.F. OF L. -A.G.C. BUILDING TRADES WELFARE PLAN et al v. BIOVAIL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2003mc00223
Defendant:
ELAN PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., BIOVAIL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC., WALGREEN COMPANY, SHERMAN ACT and others
In Re:
NIFEDIPINE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
United Food & Commercial Worke, et al v. AMGEN, INC., et al
as 09-56118
In Re:
In re: EPOGEN AND ARANESP OFF-LABEL MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA AND REGIONAL HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, SHEET METAL WORKERS NATIONAL HEALTH FUND, GLENN RANDLE, Trustee, Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DA VITA, INC., FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. and AMGEN, INC.
United Food & Commercial Workers Central Pennsylvania and Regional Health & Welfare Fund v. Amgen Inc.
as 4:2007cv02125
Plaintiff:
United Food & Commercial Workers Central Pennsylvania and Regional Health & Welfare Fund, United Food & Commercial Workers Central Pennsylvania and Regional Health & Welfare Fund, United Food & Commercial Workers Central Pennsylvania and Regional Health & Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., Amgen Inc., Amgen Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United Food & Commercial Workers Central Pennsylvania and Regional Health & Welfare Fund v. Amgen Inc
as 2:2007cv03623
Plaintiff:
United Food & Commercial Workers Central Pennsylvania and Regional Health & Welfare Fund, United Food & Commercial Workers Central Pennsylvania and Regional Health & Welfare Fund, United Food & Commercial Workers Central Pennsylvania and Regional Health & Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Amgen Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
