Cases 1 - 8 of 8
TRUMP v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2021cv02769
Plaintiff:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Defendant:
BENNIE G. THOMPSON, DAVID S. FERRIERO, United States House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol and others
Amicus Curiae:
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION WATCH, NATIONAL SECURITY COUNSELORS, LOUIS FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 44 U.S.C. § 2107
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv02034
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, RODNEY S. SCOTT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE and others
Plaintiff:
TEXAS CIVIL RIGHTS PROJECT and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
J. B. B. C. v. WOLF et al
as 1:2020cv01509
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, RODNEY S. SCOTT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE and others
Plaintiff:
J. B. B. C. and E.Y.
Amicus Curiae:
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT
Petitioner:
SCHOLARS OF REFUGEE AND IMMIGRATION LAW
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
G. Y. J. P. v. WOLF et al
as 1:2020cv01511
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, RODNEY S. SCOTT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE and others
Plaintiff:
G. Y. J. P.
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
THOMPSON v. NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2019cv01795
Defendant:
NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION and HEIDI R. KING
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. THOMPSON, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
DURU v. KAISER PERMANENTE et al
as 1:2018cv02752
Defendant:
KAISER PERMANENTE GEORGIA, ROBERT SCHREINER, HEIDI H. HARRISON and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WULTZ et al v. BANK OF CHINA LTD
as 1:2013mc01282
Plaintiff:
SHERYL WULTZ , YEKUTIEL WULTZ , AMANDA WULTZ and others
Defendant:
BANK OF CHINA LTD
Movant:
STATE OF ISRAEL
Intervenor:
RIVKA MARTHA MORIAH , ATARA NESIA MORIAH , DAVID MORIAH and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
RASHEED v. WINSTON, et al.,
as 1:2010cv02088
Plaintiff:
AHMAD RASHEED
Defendant:
RHONDA REID WINSTON, CATHY LANIER, PAUL TOLOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
