Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 619
HENRY v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01276
Plaintiff: MICHAEL F. HENRY
Defendant: JOHN ROBERTS, MARY JANE THEIS, DIANE SYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALL v. HENRY J. FISHMAN, M.D., P.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00954
Plaintiff: STEPHEN J. WALL
Defendant: HENRY J. FISHMAN, M.D., P.C. and HENRY J. FISHMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00689
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WIRTZ et al v. ERICSSON INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff: SAUNDRA WIRTZ, DAVID WIRTZ, FRANCES WIRTZ and others
Defendant: ERICSSON INC., ERICSSON AB, TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
USA v. Jeffrey Williamson
as 24-3014
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Jeffrey Henry Williamson
LARSEN v. SLEDGE, INC.
as 1:2024cv00388
Plaintiff: ANDREW LARSEN, DAISHA HENRY, ROXANNA ULLOA and others
Defendant: SLEDGE, INC. D/B/A 9:30 CLUB, ITS MY PARTY, INC., SLEDGE, INC. doing business as 9:30 CLUB and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03931
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03778
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
SCHOLOGEL
as 1:2023mc00137
Not Yet Classified: HENRY J. SCHOLOGEL, JR. doing business as HELLFIRE: ALL
MYERS v. GL SOLUTIONS GMBH & CO. KG We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03619
Plaintiff: HENRY MYERS, HENRY BARHITE and HENRY CHRIST
Defendant: GL SOLUTIONS GMBH & CO. KG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?