Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv07787
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Washington v. Fang et al
as 1:2026cv00398
Plaintiff:
Leo Washington
Defendant:
Vanessa Fang, Jasmine LeCont Mcclanahan, Rowan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Howard v. City of Selma, Texas et al
as 5:2026cv05833
Plaintiff:
Damar Ivar Dominick Howard
Defendant:
City of Selma, Texas, City of Schertz, Texas, Officer Christopher Terranova and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henry v. Boyd
as 1:2026cv02496
Petitioner:
Stephen S. Henry
Respondent:
L. G. Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henry P. Arredondo v. United States of America
as 2:2026cv00063
Defendant:
Henry P. Arredondo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00957
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv07101
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Givens v. Upshur County Sheriff's Department
as 6:2026cv00402
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Givens
Defendant:
Upshur County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Givens v. Upshur County Sheriff's Department
as 2:2026cv00756
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Givens
Defendant:
Upshur County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv06885
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
