Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Cruise Connections Charter, et al v. Attorney General of Canada, et al
as 14-7123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cruise Connections Charter Management 1, LP and Cruise Connections Charter Management GP, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Attorney General of Canada, representing the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, an agency of the Ministry of Public Safety Canada and Her Majesty The Queen, in Right of Canada, the Government of Canada, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, representing the Vancouver 2010 Integrated Security Unit
Cruise Connections Charter, et al v. Attorney General of Canada, et al
as 14-7117
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Cruise Connections Charter Management 1, LP and Cruise Connections Charter Management GP, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Attorney General of Canada, representing the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, an agency of the Ministry of Public Safety Canada and Her Majesty The Queen, in Right of Canada, the Government of Canada, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, representing the Vancouver 2010 Integrated Security Unit
Cruise Connections Charter Mgt, et al v. Attorney General of Canada, et al
as 09-7060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cruise Connections Charter Management 1, LP and Cruise Connections Charter Management GP, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Attorney General of Canada, representing the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, an agency of the Ministry of Public Safety Canada and Her Majesty The Queen, in Right of Canada, the Government of Canada, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, representing the Vancouver 2010 Integrated Security Unit
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada v. Pistris, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv11970
Plaintiff:
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada
Defendant:
Pistris, Inc.
Trustee:
TD Banknorth, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
