Cases 1 - 10 of 2,692
Hernandez et al v. Telecom Business Solution, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03457
Petitioner:
Jorge Hernandez, Alberto Arzu, Alejandro Sagastume and others
Respondent:
Telecom Business Solution, LLC, Latam Towers, LLC and AMLQ Holdings (Cay), Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 205 Removal from State Court: Enforcement of Foreign Arbital Awards
Ramos Hernandez v. L & J Tires LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03318
Plaintiff:
Gelmen H. Ramos Hernandez
Defendant:
L & J Tires LLC d/b/a Tire Town Express and Juan Arias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
United States of America v. Best (Cox)
as 24-1188
Defendant:
WALLACE BEST, JEFFREY THOMAS, OSCAR GARCIA-HERNANDEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. Carvajal-Barrios (Alcala Cordones)
as 24-1152
Defendant:
HUGO ARMANDO CARVAJAL-BARRIOS, LUCIANO MARIN ARANGO, SEUXIS PAUCIS HERNANDEZ SOLARTE and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Monjarrez-Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-1130
Petitioner:
BELINDA ARACELY MONJARREZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hernandez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03157
Plaintiff:
Omar Hernandez
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Avendano Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-1096
Petitioner:
GASPAR AVENDANO HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
