Cases 61 - 70 of 8,968
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Hercules Ramirez v. Garland
as 24-889
Petitioner:
ISAURA VERONICA HERCULES RAMIREZ, ALAN HERNANDEZ HERCULES and MELANY HERNANDEZ HERCULES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Morales-Hernandez
as 24-2156
Defendant:
LUIS ANTONIO MORALES-HERNANDEZ and Luis Morales-Hernandez
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hernandez-Cerna, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1922
Petitioner:
ROSA LIDIA HERNANDEZ-CERNA and KENNETH HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Allen v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 24-785
Plaintiff:
PETER ALLEN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, BRIAN BERNARD, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MARK DANIELS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
Dr. CAROL MOORES, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, CHUN LEE, MD and others
Carl Puckett, et al v. Jabbar, et al
as 24-5282
Plaintiff:
CARL PUCKETT and MARCELLA PUCKETT
Defendant:
AIN JEEM, INC., CHRIS STAVRO, DEBORAH MORALES and others
Hernandez-Barraza v. Wrigley
as 24-1886
Petitioner:
JOSE ISRAEL HERNANDEZ-BARRAZA
Respondent:
JEFF WRIGLEY
USA v. Zapata
as 24-20124
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Juan Javier Hernandez Zapata
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Williams
as 24-736
Defendant:
DAJUAN WILLIAMS, JUWON ROBINSON, DASHAWN PULLEY and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
